Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWC vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWC and SCHP
Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHP costs 0.57 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.3 points.
| Measure | IWC | SCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | −0.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Microcap Index | US TIPS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.2bn | $16.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWC and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHP
SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or SCHP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and SCHP −0.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWC or SCHP?
- SCHP is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWC against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWC against SCHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schp
[IWC against SCHP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.