Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to VT's +13.5%; 60% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and VT
Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; VT is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | IWB | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $48.6bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 60% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 3, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 955 weekly returnsIWB returned more: +720.6% to +371.6%. IWB and VT swung about the same: 18.3% and 18.3%. IWB fell slightly less at its worst: −46.7% to −48.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWB | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +720.6% | +371.6% | IWB | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.1% | +8.8% | IWB | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +501.7% | +221.4% | IWB | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.3% | 18.3% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.9% | 13.1% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −46.7% | −48.3% | IWB (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.64 | 0.48 | IWB | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.91 | 0.66 | IWB | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.26 | 0.18 | IWB | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 955 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VT hold 60% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
60% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWB follows Russell 1000 Index and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Number of holdings. IWB holds 1,025 positions and VT holds 10194.
- Holdings in common (similar). 60% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vt
[IWB against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.