Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWB vs URTH: how they differ
IWB and URTH hold 71% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and URTH hold 71% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWB | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | 7.26% | 5.52% |
| APPLE | 6.73% | 5.28% |
| MICROSOFT | 5.21% | 3.82% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.49% | 2.67% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A | 2.77% | 2.14% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.40% | 1.79% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C | 2.24% | 1.70% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 2.02% | 1.56% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 1.57% | 1.21% |
| TESLA INC | 1.52% | 1.15% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.35% | 1.04% |
| ELI LILLY | 1.28% | 0.99% |
| Only in IWB | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.07% | ASML HOLDING 0.73% |
| MODERNA 0.07% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.39% |
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.07% | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.32% |
| COUPANG CLASS A 0.03% | SHELL PLC 0.29% |
| EAST WEST BANCORP 0.03% | MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.28% |
| GUARDANT HEALTH 0.03% | NOVARTIS AG 0.28% |
| MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 0.03% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.27% |
| OVINTIV 0.03% | NESTLE SA 0.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Russell 1000 | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.8 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.9% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 945 | 1230 |
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or URTH?
- IWB charges 0.15% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWB and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 71% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources