Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB and URTH finished level, +13.1% against +13.1%, and they share 73% of their weight.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and URTHNet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $49.1bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.09 points a year less; both returned +13.1% over a year; IWB is 5.5 times larger.
| Measure | IWB | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Net assets | $49.1bn | $8.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 73% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and URTH hold 73% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
73% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or URTH?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-urth
[IWB against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.