Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs VGSH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to VGSH's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and VGSH

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $35.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+1.7%
VGSH total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.03%
VGSH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGSH costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points; IWB is 1.4 times larger.

IWB vs VGSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBVGSH
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+1.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexBloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$48.6bn$35.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VGSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB VGSH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in VGSH
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.43%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.39%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.35%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.34%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.33%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.33%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index of Short-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +1.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) +1.8% (SCHO)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE −0.1 pts vs SCHO
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 1025 93
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGSH as of Sep 30, 2026 $49.1bn $35.1bn

IWB and VGSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

VGSH

VGSH tracks an index of Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VGSH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and VGSH +1.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VGSH?
VGSH is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against VGSH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vgsh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.