Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to JAAA's +4.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and JAAA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $49.1bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $32.5bn for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+4.7%
JAAA total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.20%
JAAA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWB costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; IWB is 1.5 times larger.

IWB vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBJAAA
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+4.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets$49.1bn$32.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and JAAA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB JAAA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in JAAA
KKR CLO 35 Ltd. 0.85%
AB BSL CLO 1 Ltd. 0.79%
Anchorage Capital CLO 16 Ltd. 0.73%
Palmer Square CLO Ltd. 0.69%
Ares LXI CLO Ltd. 0.68%
Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.62%
WISE CLO Ltd. 0.62%
Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +4.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Holdings 1025 598
Net assets $49.1bn $32.5bn

IWB and JAAA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

JAAA

JAAA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or JAAA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and JAAA +4.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or JAAA?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against JAAA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-jaaa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.