Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to VDC's +12.7%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and VDC

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $7.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+12.7%
VDC total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.09%
VDC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VDC costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IWB is 6.6 times larger.

IWB vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBVDC
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+12.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Oct 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$48.6bn$7.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common5%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%66.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IWB VDC
Return
Total return edge IWB +902.2% +674.3%
Annualized edge IWB +10.6% +9.4%
Price return edge IWB +578.1% +360.8%
Risk
Volatility edge VDC 17.4% 13.2%
Max drawdown edge VDC −54.8% −32.7%
Downside capture 100.1% 99.6%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VDC (slight) 0.57 0.61
Sortino edge VDC (slight) 0.80 0.86
Treynor 0.130 0.075
Calmar edge VDC 0.19 0.29
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.09 0.27
Information ratio −0.03 0.04
Tracking error 1.0% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IWB against VONE, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VDC against FSTA, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWB returned more: +902.2% to +674.3%. VDC swung less: 13.2% to 17.4%. VDC fell less at its worst: −32.7% to −54.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWB vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBVDCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+902.2%+674.3%IWBPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.6%+9.4%IWBTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+578.1%+360.8%IWBPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.4%13.2%VDCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.3%9.4%VDCLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−54.8%−32.7%VDCDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.1%99.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%99.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.570.61VDC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.800.86VDC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.075Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.190.29VDCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVONEFSTAThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.090.27Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.5%−0.3% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.030.04Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VDC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB VDC
WALMART 0.74% 13.86%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.62% 12.12%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.52% 9.90%
COCA-COLA 0.50% 9.80%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.44% 4.83%
PEPSICO 0.26% 4.28%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 0.17% 3.86%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL CLASS A 0.11% 2.58%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE 0.10% 2.28%
MONSTER BEVERAGE 0.09% 2.08%
TARGET CORP 0.09% 2.50%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC 0.06% 1.48%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in VDC
Chefs' Warehouse Inc 0.29%
PriceSmart Inc 0.29%
United Natural Foods Inc 0.23%
WD-40 Co 0.23%
Cal-Maine Foods Inc 0.22%
Vita Coco Co Inc 0.22%
Andersons Inc 0.22%
Interparfums Inc 0.21%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index of Consumer Staples
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +12.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) +12.7% (FSTA)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE 0.0 pts vs FSTA
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 86.4%
Holdings 1025 105
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VDC as of Sep 30, 2026 $49.1bn $7.4bn

IWB and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-51ED1C7D87

IWB and VDC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWB follows Russell 1000 Index and VDC follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. IWB holds 1,025 positions and VDC holds 105.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

VDC

VDC tracks an index of Consumer Staples. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +12.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 66.0%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VDC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and VDC +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VDC?
VDC is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 86% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against VDC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vdc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.