Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs XLC: how they differ

IWB and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in XLC
NVIDIA 7.26%META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 18.92%
APPLE 6.73%ALPHABET INC CL A 10.12%
MICROSOFT 5.21%ALPHABET INC CL C 8.10%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%AT+T INC 5.19%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 5.03%
BROADCOM INC 2.40%WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.76%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 4.61%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%COMCAST CORP CLASS A 4.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IWB and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000Communication services
Total return, 1 year+16.7%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%100.0%
Holdings94526

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 70.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or XLC?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and XLC returned −2.0%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or XLC?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against XLC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources