IWB vs SPHB: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and SPHB hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and SPHB returned +37.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $1.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.

IWB costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.8 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $1.0bn.

IWB vs SPHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBSPHB
Expense ratio0.15%0.25%
Net assets$49.6bn$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+37.4%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexS&P 500 High Beta Index
Holdings in common21%
Holdings datedOct 9, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+37.4%
SPHB total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.25%
SPHB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SPHB hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB SPHB
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.93%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 2.01%
TESLA INC 1.56% 1.31%
NVIDIA 7.44% 0.98%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 0.94%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 0.88%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 0.75%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 0.69%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.67% 1.46%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.65% 1.03%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.56% 1.26%
LAM RESEARCH 0.55% 1.58%
Only in IWB
APPLE 6.77%
MICROSOFT 5.53%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34%
ELI LILLY 1.31%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.97%
VISA CLASS A 0.91%
Only in SPHB
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.09%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.89%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.80%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.01%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +37.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 100.0%
Holdings 1025 101
Net assets $49.6bn $1.0bn

IWB and SPHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About SPHB

SPHB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +37.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SPHB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and SPHB +37.4%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SPHB?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and SPHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of SPHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against SPHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-sphb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.