Which returned more over the last year, IWB or JNK?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and JNK returned +3.3%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWB or JNK?

IWB charges 0.15% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs JNK: how they differ

IWB and JNK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWB	Only in JNK
NVIDIA 7.26%	1261229 BC LTD 0.64%
APPLE 6.73%	MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 0.58%
MICROSOFT 5.21%	ECHOSTAR CORP 0.52%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%	PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.49%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC 0.42%
BROADCOM INC 2.40%	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 0.41%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%	DISH NETWORK CORP 0.41%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%	SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IWB and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	JNK State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Russell 1000	SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year	+16.7%	+3.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	−14.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.40%
Holdings	945	1198

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

JNK in plain words

JNK is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or JNK?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and JNK returned +3.3%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or JNK?: IWB charges 0.15% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against JNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against JNK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-jnk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources