Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to JNK's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and JNK

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $5.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+1.7%
JNK total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.40%
JNK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWB costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points; IWB is 8.4 times larger.

IWB vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBJNK
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+1.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexBloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$48.7bn$5.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB JNK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in JNK
1261229 BC LTD SR SECURED 144A 04/32 10 0.65%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC SR SECURED 144A 04/31 6.25 0.53%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC SR SECURED 144A 03/32 6.375 0.46%
ECHOSTAR CORP SR SECURED 11/29 10.75 0.45%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/32 9.25 0.44%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/34 9.75 0.43%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 SR SECURED 144A 05/31 6.5 0.42%
VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC SR SECURED 144A 02/29 9.5 0.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +1.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE +3.1 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.40%
Holdings 1025 1142
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and JNK as of Oct 27, 2026 $49.1bn $5.9bn

IWB and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB and JNK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or JNK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and JNK +1.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or JNK?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against JNK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-jnk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.