Which returned more over the last year, HYG or IWB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, HYG or IWB?

HYG charges 0.49% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HYG vs IWB: how they differ

HYG and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HYG and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HYG	Only in IWB
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.68%	NVIDIA 7.26%
1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56%	APPLE 6.73%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.47%	MICROSOFT 5.21%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.35%	AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%
WULF COMPUTE LLC 144A 0.29%	ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%
GALAXY HELIOS DATA CENTERS II LLC 144A 0.28%	BROADCOM INC 2.40%
PANTHER ESCROW ISSUER LLC 144A 0.28%	ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%
SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.28%	META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

HYG and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	US high yield bonds	Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year	+2.9%	+16.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.6 pts	−0.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.15%
Holdings	1326	945

HYG in plain words

HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYG or IWB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HYG or IWB?: HYG charges 0.49% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HYG against IWB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources