IVW vs NULG: Differences, Returns & Fees
IVW and NULG hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and IVW returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets: $77.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, and $2.7bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF.
IVW costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; IVW is far larger, $73.8bn against $2.7bn.
| IVW | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.26% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $73.8bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +11.5% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Growth Index | Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.2% | 44.0% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
IVW and NULG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IVW follows S&P 500 Growth Index and NULG follows Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 IVW returned +15.7% and NULG +11.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVW and NULG hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
33% in common
On the same fields
IVW and NULG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IVW
IVW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About NULG
NULG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 44.0%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVW or NULG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVW returned +15.7% and NULG +11.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IVW or NULG?
- IVW is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVW against NULG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-nulg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IVW against NULG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-nulg
[IVW against NULG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-nulg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.