Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IVV vs XYLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to XYLG's +14.6%, and IVV charges 0.03% to XYLG's 0.35%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IVV and XYLG
Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $72m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; IVV is far larger, $896.3bn against $72m.
| Measure | IVV | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.7% | +14.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 12.4% | rose 0.6% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 4.4% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 | Benchmark: S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 1.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $896.3bn | $72m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 86% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 2, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 316 weekly returns · each against SPYIVV returned more: +147.8% to +109.4%. XYLG swung less: 12.7% to 16.0%. XYLG fell less at its worst: −21.0% to −23.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IVV | XYLG | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +147.8% | +109.4% | IVV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +16.1% | +12.9% | IVV | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +127.8% | +15.3% | IVV | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 16.0% | 12.7% | XYLG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 10.4% | 8.7% | XYLG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −23.9% | −21.0% | XYLG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 100.5% | 67.5% | 100.0% | IVV | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 100.2% | 81.5% | 100.0% | XYLG | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.00 | XYLG lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.77 | IVV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.24 | 1.12 | IVV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.129 | 0.125 | 0.129 | IVV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.67 | 0.62 | IVV (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | 0.0% a year | −0.3% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.32 | −0.26 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −0.2% to +0.3% | −2.5% to +1.9% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.24 | −0.71 | IVV | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.3% | 4.5% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 316 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IVV and XYLG hold 86% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
86% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IVV and XYLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
IVV and XYLG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and XYLG is measured against S&P 500 through SPY.
- Cost. IVV charges 0.03% of assets a year and XYLG 0.35%, a gap of 0.32 points.
- Size. IVV has $896.3bn in net assets and XYLG $72m (net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026); IVV is 12448.6 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
XYLG
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XYLG paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
- Are IVV and XYLG in the same category?
- IVV is a stock ETF and XYLG is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or XYLG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and XYLG +14.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or XYLG?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVV against XYLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-xylg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IVV against XYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-xylg
[IVV against XYLG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-xylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.