Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IVV vs RYLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to RYLD's +12.1%, and IVV charges 0.03% to RYLD's 0.60%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IVV and RYLD
Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.57 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; IVV is far larger, $896.3bn against $1.3bn.
| Measure | IVV | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.7% | +12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 12.4% | fell 0.6% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 11.5% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 | Benchmark: Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 2.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $896.3bn | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IVV and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IVV and RYLD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
RYLD
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
- Are IVV and RYLD in the same category?
- IVV is a stock ETF and RYLD is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or RYLD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and RYLD +12.1%.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or RYLD?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVV against RYLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-ryld
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IVV against RYLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-ryld
[IVV against RYLD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-ryld)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.