Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
IVV vs QBUL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IVV returned +14.8% to QBUL's +0.4%, and IVV charges 0.03% to QBUL's 0.79%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IVV and QBUL
Net assets: $872.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $28m on Jul 31, 2026 for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.76 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.4 points.
| Measure | IVV | QBUL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +0.4% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +0.3% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 3.3 points behind | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% |
| Net assets, IVV as of Nov 3, 2026 and QBUL as of Jul 31, 2026 | $872.0bn | $28m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.3% | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.85 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.20: about 0.20% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.26% | |
| Down-week capture | 23.9% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Jul 12, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 120 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 30, 2026; QBUL against VOO, Jul 12, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Jul 2024 to Oct 2026, IVV returned more: +38.7% to +5.6%. QBUL swung less: 3.1% to 15.1%. QBUL fell less at its worst: −2.1% to −16.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IVV | QBUL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +38.7% | +5.6% | IVV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.2% | +2.4% | IVV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +34.8% | −4.8% | IVV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.1% | 3.1% | QBUL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.9% | 2.4% | QBUL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −16.9% | −2.1% | QBUL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.3% | 13.4% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.7% | 27.3% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.99 | 0.16 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.56 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.74 | −0.56 | IVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.13 | −0.74 | IVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.080 | −0.112 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.90 | 1.12 | QBUL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | SPY | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.1% a year | −3.5% a year | IVV not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.33 | −2.55 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.4% to +0.5% | −6.3% to −0.8% | IVV includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.00 | −1.02 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.2% | 12.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 120 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
IVV and QBUL on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
QBUL
QBUL is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.85 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.20, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.20% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks QBUL fell 0.26% on average, a down-week capture of 23.9%. Over the same 52 weeks QBUL returned +0.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.3 percentage points behind cash.
Questions people ask
- Are IVV and QBUL in the same category?
- IVV is a stock ETF and QBUL is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or QBUL?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +14.8% and QBUL +0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or QBUL?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.76 percentage points a year. That is about $76 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVV against QBUL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-qbul
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). IVV against QBUL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-qbul
[IVV against QBUL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-qbul)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.