Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ITWO vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITWO returned +16.5% to IWM's +14.1%, and IWM charges 0.19% to ITWO's 0.55%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ITWO and IWM
Net assets: $181m on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF, and $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $182m.
| Measure | ITWO | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +14.1% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 6.3% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 81% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Benchmark: Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $182m | $75.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 78% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 110 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: ITWO against IWM, Sep 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026; IWM against VTWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
ITWO returned slightly more: +31.8% to +30.3%. ITWO swung slightly less: 17.7% to 18.9%. ITWO fell less at its worst: −22.2% to −24.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ITWO | IWM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +31.8% | +30.3% | ITWO (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.9% | +13.3% | ITWO (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +4.2% | +27.2% | IWM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.7% | 18.9% | ITWO (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.9% | 12.5% | ITWO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −22.2% | −24.7% | ITWO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 94.6% | 101.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 96.7% | 100.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.92 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.96 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.60 | 0.54 | ITWO (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.89 | 0.82 | ITWO (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.115 | 0.106 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.63 | 0.54 | ITWO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWM | VTWO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +1.2% a year | −0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.46 | −0.36 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −3.9% to +6.2% | −0.6% to +0.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.08 | −0.02 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.0% | 1.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 110 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ITWO and IWM hold 78% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
78% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ITWO and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
ITWO and IWM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ITWO is measured against Russell 2000 through IWM and IWM follows Russell 2000 Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ITWO returned +16.5% and IWM +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.4 points.
- Cost. ITWO charges 0.55% of assets a year and IWM 0.19%, a gap of 0.36 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ITWO
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITWO paid 8.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.4 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly. ProShares estimates that 81% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are ITWO and IWM in the same category?
- ITWO is an option-income ETF and IWM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, ITWO or IWM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITWO returned +16.5% and IWM +14.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ITWO or IWM?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ITWO against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itwo-vs-iwm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ITWO against IWM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itwo-vs-iwm
[ITWO against IWM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itwo-vs-iwm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.