Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ACYS vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ACYS and IWM are measured over different days, and IWM charges 0.19% to ACYS's 0.75%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACYS and IWM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $613m for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+4.7%
ACYS total return, since launch, Apr 23, 2026
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.75%
ACYS expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.56 points a year less; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $613m.

ACYS vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureACYSIWM
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+14.1%
Cash paid, share of starting value, since Apr 23, 20262.6%
Price change, since Apr 23, 2026rose 2.1%
Latest payout, annualized7.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate18% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: Russell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000 Index
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 2.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$613m$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 1, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 25 weekly returns
ACYS IWM
Return
Total return edge ACYS +3.8% −0.8%
Price return edge ACYS +1.2% −1.3%
Risk
Max drawdown edge ACYS −0.5% −11.1%
Reading

ACYS returned more: +3.8% to −0.8%. ACYS fell less at its worst: −0.5% to −11.1%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ACYS vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureACYSIWMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+3.8%−0.8%ACYSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return+1.2%−1.3%ACYSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown−0.5%−11.1%ACYSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 25 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACYS and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACYS IWM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACYS
ACYS Autocall Derivative Citi 0.30%
ACYS Autocall Derivative JPMorgan 0.12%
ACYS Autocall Derivative BNP 0.10%
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
What it is autocallable, vs IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +4.7% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.6% (IWM) (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark +2.1 pts vs IWM (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.19%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 1977
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $613m $75.5bn

ACYS and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for ACYS.

Alert

ACYS and IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACYS

Over the period from its first trade on Apr 23, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026, ACYS paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +2.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 18% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are ACYS and IWM in the same category?
ACYS is an option-income ETF and IWM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, ACYS or IWM?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACYS against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acys-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.