Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ITOT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITOT returned +13.4% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITOT and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $97.1bn for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+13.4%
ITOT total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.03%
ITOT expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ITOT costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.2 points; ITOT is 12.1 times larger.

ITOT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureITOTPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+55.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Total Market Index (TMI)No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$97.1bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITOT PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITOT
NVIDIA 7.06%
APPLE 6.78%
MICROSOFT 5.28%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.32%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.52%
BROADCOM INC 2.18%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.02%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.83%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.4% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.59%
Holdings 2443 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $97.1bn $8.0bn

ITOT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ITOT and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITOT

ITOT tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,443 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +13.4% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or PDBC?
ITOT is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITOT against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.