Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ITOT vs PDBC: how they differ
ITOT and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ITOT | Only in PDBC |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.32% | Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58% |
| APPLE 6.63% | POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42% |
| MICROSOFT 5.06% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.41% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70% | |
| BROADCOM INC 2.37% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.16% | |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market | Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +55.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +37.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 88.3% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1167 | 2 |
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or PDBC?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ITOT or PDBC?
- ITOT charges 0.03% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ITOT and PDBC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 0% of PDBC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against PDBC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources