Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ITOT vs NOBL: how they differ
ITOT and NOBL hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and NOBL hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ITOT | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 0.94% | 1.56% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.88% | 1.51% |
| WALMART INC | 0.64% | 1.42% |
| ABBVIE | 0.62% | 1.47% |
| CHEVRON | 0.55% | 1.61% |
| CATERPILLAR INC | 0.51% | 1.34% |
| COCA-COLA | 0.47% | 1.56% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE | 0.46% | 1.42% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES | 0.30% | 1.72% |
| LINDE PLC | 0.29% | 1.33% |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIES | 0.25% | 1.47% |
| PEPSICO | 0.25% | 1.46% |
| Only in ITOT | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.32% | BROWN-FORMAN CORP-CLASS B 1.44% |
| APPLE 6.63% | |
| MICROSOFT 5.06% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.41% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70% | |
| BROADCOM INC 2.37% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.16% | |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 88.3% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1167 | 69 |
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ITOT or NOBL?
- ITOT charges 0.03% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ITOT and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources