Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ITM vs MUNI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ITM's duration was 5.6 years on Jul 31, 2026 and MUNI's 4.5 on Jun 30, 2026; ITM charges 0.18% to MUNI's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITM and MUNI

Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF, and $3.1bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
−0.5%
ITM total return, 1 year
+0.1%
MUNI total return, 1 year
0.18%
ITM expense ratio
0.35%
MUNI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ITM costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.

ITM vs MUNI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureITMMUNI
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.5%+0.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.35%
Net assets, ITM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MUNI as of Jun 30, 2026$2.3bn$3.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 24, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 878 weekly returns
ITM MUNI
Return
Total return edge ITM +63.2% +54.0%
Annualized edge ITM +2.9% +2.6%
Price return edge ITM +6.5% +1.9%
Risk
Volatility edge MUNI 7.5% 4.1%
Max drawdown edge MUNI −19.3% −10.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MUNI 0.22 0.27
Sortino edge MUNI 0.33 0.38
Calmar edge MUNI 0.15 0.24
Reading

ITM returned more: +63.2% to +54.0%. MUNI swung less: 4.1% to 7.5%. MUNI fell less at its worst: −10.9% to −19.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ITM vs MUNI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureITMMUNIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+63.2%+54.0%ITMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.9%+2.6%ITMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+6.5%+1.9%ITMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility7.5%4.1%MUNISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation5.0%2.9%MUNILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.3%−10.9%MUNIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.220.27MUNIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.330.38MUNIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.150.24MUNIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 878 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, ITM and MUNI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITM MUNI
NEW YORK ENERGY FIN DEV CORP, due Jul 1, 2056 0.24% 0.25%
CMWLTH FING AUTH PA TOBACCO MASTER SETTLEMENT PAYMENT REV, due Jun 1, 2039 0.26% 0.24%
NEW YORK ST DORM AUTH REVENUES NON ST SUPPORTED DEBT, due May 1, 2034 0.21% 0.22%
NATIONAL FIN AUTH NH MUNI CTFS, due Jan 20, 2041 0.27% 0.20%
MICHIGAN ST HOSP FIN AUTH, due Aug 15, 2035 0.21% 0.17%
N TX TOLLWAY AUTH REVENUE, due Jan 1, 2034 0.16% 0.19%
GREAT LAKES MI WTR AUTH SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYS REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2037 0.15% 0.18%
HENRICO CNTY VA ECON DEV AUTH HLTH FACS REVENUE, due Nov 1, 2035 0.16% 0.15%
KENTUCKY ST PUBLIC ENERGY AUTH GAS SPLY REVENUE, due May 1, 2036 0.12% 0.59%
BLACK BELT ENERGY GAS DIST AL GAS PROJECT REVENUE, due Dec 1, 2055 0.23% 0.11%
INDIANA ST FIN AUTH HLTH SYS REVENUE, due Oct 1, 2057 0.10% 0.11%
CALIFORNIA ST, due Sep 1, 2043 0.14% 0.10%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITM
NEW JERSEY ST EDUCTNL FACS AUTH REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2064 0.53%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Aug 1, 2055 0.50%
CALIFORNIA ST, due Mar 1, 2036 0.45%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Feb 1, 2055 0.44%
CONNECTICUT ST HLTH & EDUCTNL FACS AUTH REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2064 0.39%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Jan 1, 2056 0.37%
CALIFORNIA ST, due Aug 1, 2032 0.30%
NEW YORK CITY NY MUNI WTR FIN AUTH WTR & SWR SYS REVENUE, due Jun 15, 2034 0.28%
Only in MUNI
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 29, 2028 2.20%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 28, 2031 1.78%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Apr 30, 2031 1.16%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 28, 2031 0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax Revenue, due Jul 1, 2046 0.81%
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, due Jul 1, 2057 0.81%
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. V, due Apr 1, 2036 0.80%
Fort Bend Independent School District, due Aug 1, 2055 0.79%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer VanEck PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.5% +0.1%
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.35%
Holdings 1410 647
Net assets, ITM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MUNI as of Jun 30, 2026 $2.3bn $3.1bn

ITM and MUNI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6845937C61

ITM and MUNI are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. ITM follows ICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index and MUNI follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. Cost. ITM charges 0.18% of assets a year and MUNI 0.35%, a gap of 0.17 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ITM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITM

ITM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MUNI

MUNI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITM or MUNI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITM returned −0.5% and MUNI +0.1%.
Which is cheaper, ITM or MUNI?
ITM is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITM against MUNI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itm-vs-muni

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.