Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ITM vs MMIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On Jul 31, 2026 ITM's duration was 5.6 years and MMIT's 5.7; ITM charges 0.18% to MMIT's 0.30%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITM and MMIT

Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF, and $1.5bn on Jul 31, 2026 for NYLIM MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF.

At a glance
−0.5%
ITM total return, 1 year
+0.4%
MMIT total return, 1 year
0.18%
ITM expense ratio
0.30%
MMIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ITM costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points.

ITM vs MMIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureITMMMIT
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.5%+0.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.30%
Net assets, ITM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MMIT as of Jul 31, 2026$2.3bn$1.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 27, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 469 weekly returns
ITM MMIT
Return
Total return edge MMIT +17.0% +23.5%
Annualized edge MMIT +1.8% +2.4%
Price return edge ITM (slight) −5.7% −6.0%
Risk
Volatility edge MMIT 9.2% 5.5%
Max drawdown edge MMIT −19.3% −12.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MMIT −0.06 −0.04
Sortino edge MMIT −0.09 −0.05
Calmar edge MMIT 0.09 0.20
Reading

MMIT returned more: +23.5% to +17.0%. MMIT swung less: 5.5% to 9.2%. MMIT fell less at its worst: −12.0% to −19.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ITM vs MMIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureITMMMITEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+17.0%+23.5%MMITPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.8%+2.4%MMITTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−5.7%−6.0%ITM (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility9.2%5.5%MMITSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.1%4.0%MMITLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.3%−12.0%MMITDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.06−0.04MMITReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.09−0.05MMITReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.090.20MMITAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 469 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, ITM and MMIT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITM MMIT
KENTUCKY ST PUBLIC ENERGY AUTH GAS SPLY REVENUE, due Jan 1, 2055 0.29% 0.53%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Aug 1, 2055 0.50% 0.22%
MASSACHUSETTS ST DEV FIN AGY REVENUE, due May 15, 2055 0.26% 0.15%
KENTUCKY ST PUBLIC ENERGY AUTH GAS SPLY REVENUE, due Apr 1, 2054 0.15% 0.18%
LOS ANGELES CA DEPT OF WTR & PWR REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2042 0.20% 0.13%
PEFA INC IA GAS PROJ REVENUE, due Apr 1, 2035 0.15% 0.11%
INDIANA ST FIN AUTH HLTH SYS REVENUE, due Oct 1, 2057 0.10% 0.17%
SOUTH DAKOTA ST HLTH & EDUCTNL FACS AUTH, due Nov 1, 2051 0.10% 0.11%
INDIANA ST FIN AUTH REVENUE, due Nov 15, 2042 0.10% 0.23%
ENERGY S E AL A COOPERATIVE DIST ENERGY SPLY REVENUE, due Nov 1, 2033 0.10% 0.33%
SOUTHEAST ENERGY AUTHORITY A COOPERATIVE, due Oct 1, 2055 0.10% 0.22%
BLACK BELT ENERGY GAS DIST AL GAS PROJECT REVENUE, due Dec 1, 2055 0.10% 0.56%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITM
NEW JERSEY ST EDUCTNL FACS AUTH REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2064 0.53%
CALIFORNIA ST, due Mar 1, 2036 0.45%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Feb 1, 2055 0.44%
CONNECTICUT ST HLTH & EDUCTNL FACS AUTH REVENUE, due Jul 1, 2064 0.39%
CALIFORNIA CMNTY CHOICE FING AUTH CLEAN ENERGY PROJ REVENUE, due Jan 1, 2056 0.37%
CALIFORNIA ST, due Aug 1, 2032 0.30%
NEW YORK CITY NY MUNI WTR FIN AUTH WTR & SWR SYS REVENUE, due Jun 15, 2034 0.28%
CALIFORNIA HSG FIN AGY MUNI CTFS, due Mar 25, 2035 0.28%
Only in MMIT
NY GOBNYC 02/01/2055, due Feb 1, 2055 1.03%
PR PRCGEN 4.33 07/01/2040, due Jul 1, 2040 1.00%
CA LOSUTL 5 07/01/2041, due Jul 1, 2041 0.91%
MN MGAUTL 5 09/01/2035, due Sep 1, 2035 0.91%
PA PASSFH 3 10/01/2051, due Oct 1, 2051 0.87%
AL BBEUTL 10/01/2052, due Oct 1, 2052 0.63%
IL SPRPWR 5 03/01/2032, due Mar 1, 2032 0.62%
IL CHIEDU 6 04/01/2046, due Apr 1, 2046 0.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF MMIT NYLIM MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.5% +0.4%
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.30%
Holdings 1410 854
Net assets, ITM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MMIT as of Jul 31, 2026 $2.3bn $1.5bn

ITM and MMIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-70888F9E94

ITM and MMIT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. ITM follows ICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index and MMIT follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
  3. Cost. ITM charges 0.18% of assets a year and MMIT 0.30%, a gap of 0.12 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ITM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITM

ITM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MMIT

MMIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITM or MMIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITM returned −0.5% and MMIT +0.4%.
Which is cheaper, ITM or MMIT?
ITM is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITM against MMIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itm-vs-mmit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.