IMTM vs IQLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

IMTM and IQLT hold 40% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $4.2bn for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF and $13.6bn for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF.

Both cost 0.30% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; IQLT is 3.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IMTMIQLT
Expense ratio0.30%0.30%
Net assets$4.2bn$13.6bn
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+14.8%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.4%23.7%
Below its high4.3%, high on Aug 17, 20264.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+15.3%
IMTM total return, 1 year
+14.8%
IQLT total return, 1 year
0.30%
IMTM expense ratio
0.30%
IQLT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IMTM and IQLT hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

40% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IMTM IQLT
ASML HOLDING 5.21% 6.01%
ADVANTEST 1.86% 2.24%
SHELL 1.91% 1.85%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.73% 2.20%
NOVARTIS AG 1.83% 1.67%
BHP GROUP LTD 1.51% 1.54%
TOKYO ELECTRON 1.37% 1.40%
TOTALENERGIES 1.67% 1.34%
IBERDROLA 1.30% 1.35%
ABB LTD 1.21% 1.93%
ALLIANZ 1.10% 2.57%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD 1.10% 1.05%
Only in IMTM
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 3.16%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 2.80%
TORONTO DOMINION 2.25%
KIOXIA HOLDINGS 1.93%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.68%
BANCO SANTANDER 1.51%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 1.24%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE 1.23%
Only in IQLT
ZURICH INSURANCE GROUP AG 1.70%
NESTLE SA 1.69%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.59%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 1.41%
UNILEVER PLC 1.33%
MUENCHENER RUECKVERSICHERUNGS-GESE 1.09%
AIRBUS GROUP 1.08%
HONG KONG EXCHANGES AND CLEARING 1.06%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.0 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 301 294
Net assets $4.2bn $13.6bn

IMTM and IQLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IMTM in plain words

IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 301 positions, with the top ten at 24.4%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IQLT in plain words

IQLT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 294 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IMTM or IQLT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMTM returned +15.3% and IQLT +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, IMTM or IQLT?
Neither: IMTM and IQLT both charge 0.30% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IMTM and IQLT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IMTM and 0% of IQLT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IMTM against IQLT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-iqlt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.