IMCV vs RSPA: how they differ
IMCV and RSPA hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and IMCV returned +20.8% over the year. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.
IMCV costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points.
| IMCV | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.29% |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +12.6% |
| Holdings in common | 32% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 13.6% | 4.2% |
| Below its high | 3.7%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | 3.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IMCV and RSPA hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
32% in common
On the same fields
IMCV and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IMCV in plain words
IMCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 270 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RSPA in plain words
RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IMCV or RSPA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMCV returned +20.8% and RSPA +12.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IMCV or RSPA?
- IMCV is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $23. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, IMCV against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imcv-vs-rspa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IMCV against RSPA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imcv-vs-rspa
[IMCV against RSPA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imcv-vs-rspa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.