Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ILF vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to XOVR's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ILF and XOVR

Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

At a glance
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XOVR total return, 1 year
0.47%
ILF expense ratio
1.81%
XOVR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ILF costs 1.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.2 points.

ILF vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureILFXOVR
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.2%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high13.7%, high on Oct 12, 20266.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Latin America 40No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%1.81%
Net assets, ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026$3.5bn$2.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%63.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ILF XOVR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Only in XOVR
N/A 17.73%
Nvidia Corp 9.47%
Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Alphabet Inc 6.52%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Applovin Corp 3.95%
Natera Inc 3.70%
Robinhood Markets Inc 3.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares ERShares
What it is Tracks an index of Latin America 40 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.2% −3.0%
Expense ratio 0.47% 1.81%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 43.4%
Holdings 46 32
Net assets, ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.5bn $2.2bn

ILF and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XOVR

XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or XOVR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and XOVR −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, ILF or XOVR?
ILF is cheaper, by 1.34 percentage points a year. That is about $134 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILF and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ILF against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-xovr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.