Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILF vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILF and URTH
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.5bn for iShares Latin America 40 ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
URTH costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; URTH is 2.5 times larger.
| Measure | ILF | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Latin America 40 | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.24% |
| Net assets | $3.5bn | $8.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILF and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or URTH?
- URTH is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILF against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILF against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-urth
[ILF against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.