Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ILF vs MGK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to MGK's +7.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ILF and MGK

Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $34.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
+7.8%
MGK total return, 1 year
0.47%
ILF expense ratio
0.05%
MGK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MGK costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; MGK is 9.2 times larger.

ILF vs MGK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureILFMGK
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+7.8%
Drawdown
Below its high13.7%, high on Oct 12, 20264.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Latin America 40Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%0.05%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.8bn$34.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%64.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and MGK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ILF MGK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Only in MGK
NVIDIA Corp 13.69%
Apple Inc 12.53%
Microsoft Corp 9.46%
Alphabet Inc 4.98%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.96%
Broadcom Inc 4.30%
Amazon.com Inc 4.22%
Alphabet Inc 3.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Latin America 40 Tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +17.2% +7.8%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.0%
Holdings 46 54
Net assets, ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 and MGK as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.5bn $34.9bn

ILF and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MGK

MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or MGK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and MGK +7.8%.
Which is cheaper, ILF or MGK?
MGK is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILF and MGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 99% of MGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ILF against MGK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-mgk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.