Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILF vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILF and IWF
Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.3 points; IWF is far larger, $124.7bn against $3.5bn.
| Measure | ILF | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Latin America 40 | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.5bn | $124.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | 57.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 2, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,303 weekly returnsIWF returned more: +1,195.8% to +925.5%. IWF swung less: 18.3% to 28.7%. IWF fell less at its worst: −50.4% to −64.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ILF | IWF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +925.5% | +1,195.8% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.7% | +10.8% | IWF (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +355.3% | +895.5% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 28.7% | 18.3% | IWF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 20.0% | 12.7% | IWF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −64.9% | −50.4% | IWF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.41 | 0.55 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.58 | 0.80 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.15 | 0.21 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,303 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILF and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ILF follows S&P Latin America 40 and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ILF returned +17.2% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or IWF?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILF against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILF against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwf
[ILF against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.