Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to VT's +13.5%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and VT
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.6 points; IWF is 1.6 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $127.7bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 36% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 3, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 955 weekly returnsIWF returned more: +986.3% to +371.6%. VT swung slightly less: 18.3% to 19.4%. IWF fell slightly less at its worst: −43.7% to −48.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWF | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +986.3% | +371.6% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.9% | +8.8% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +788.0% | +221.4% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.4% | 18.3% | VT (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.3% | 13.1% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −43.7% | −48.3% | IWF (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.69 | 0.48 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.01 | 0.66 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.32 | 0.18 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 955 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VT hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
36% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.6 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vt
[IWF against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.