Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJS vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJS returned +19.3% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJS and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.7bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+19.3%
IJS total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJS expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJS costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.3 points.

IJS vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJSPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 Value IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.7bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund8.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJS PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJS
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
SM ENERGY 1.00%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.91%
CARMAX INC 0.82%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.81%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS 0.80%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.79%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +19.3% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +19.2% (SLYV) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLYV +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.59%
Holdings 477 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.7bn $8.0bn

IJS and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJS and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJS

IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +19.3% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, IJS or PDBC?
IJS is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJS against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.