Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs ITOT: how they differ
IJS and ITOT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and ITOT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 1.68% | 0.07% |
| USD CASH | 0.05% | 0.09% |
| ACADEMY SPORTS AND OUTDOORS | 0.39% | 0.01% |
| ACI WORLDWIDE | 0.20% | 0.01% |
| AMERICAN STATES WATER | 0.13% | 0.01% |
| AMERIS BANCORP | 0.25% | 0.01% |
| APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC | 0.38% | 0.01% |
| ARCOSA | 0.28% | 0.01% |
| ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC | 0.43% | 0.01% |
| ATLANTIC UNION BANKSHARES | 0.61% | 0.01% |
| ATMUS FILTRATION TECHNOLOGIES | 0.13% | 0.01% |
| BALCHEM | 0.24% | 0.01% |
| Only in IJS | Only in ITOT |
|---|---|
| UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS INC 0.45% | NVIDIA 7.32% |
| BREAD FINANCIAL HOLDINGS 0.44% | APPLE 6.63% |
| GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC 0.42% | MICROSOFT 5.06% |
| TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS 0.40% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.41% |
| ORGANON 0.40% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70% |
| PEABODY ENERGY CORP 0.39% | BROADCOM INC 2.37% |
| CRESCENT ENERGY CLASS A 0.39% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.16% |
| STRIDE INC 0.38% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 466 | 1167 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 466 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or ITOT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or ITOT?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against ITOT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-itot Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources