Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJH vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJH returned +13.2% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJH and XLF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $122.8bn for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+13.2%
IJH total return, 1 year
+7.6%
XLF total return, 1 year
0.05%
IJH expense ratio
0.08%
XLF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJH costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; IJH is 2.4 times larger.

IJH vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJHXLF
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.2%+7.6%
Drawdown
Below its high6.5%, high on Aug 14, 20263.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P MidCap 400Financial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$122.8bn$51.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund7.2%57.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJH XLF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJH
OKTA CLASS A 1.10%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.82%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.74%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.67%
ATI 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.65%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.65%
XPO 0.64%
Only in XLF
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 12.84%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.33%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 8.69%
MASTERCARD INC A 6.26%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.18%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.37%
WELLS FARGO + CO 3.17%
MORGAN STANLEY 2.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Tracks an index of Financials
Total return, 1 year +13.2% +7.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.8% (MDY) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs MDY not measured
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 409 77
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $122.8bn $51.6bn

IJH and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJH and XLF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJH

IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.8% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 409 positions, with the top ten at 7.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLF

XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or XLF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.2% and XLF +7.6%.
Which is cheaper, IJH or XLF?
IJH is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJH against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-xlf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.