Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJH vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJH returned +13.2% to VGIT's −1.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJH and VGIT

Net assets: $122.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF, and $39.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+13.2%
IJH total return, 1 year
−1.5%
VGIT total return, 1 year
0.05%
IJH expense ratio
0.03%
VGIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGIT costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points; IJH is 3.0 times larger.

IJH vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJHVGIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.2%−1.5%
Drawdown
Below its high6.5%, high on Aug 14, 20263.5%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P MidCap 400Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$120.9bn$39.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund7.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJH VGIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJH
OKTA CLASS A 1.10%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.82%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.74%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.67%
ATI 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.65%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.65%
XPO 0.64%
Only in VGIT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.85%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +13.2% −1.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.8% (MDY) −1.5% (SCHR)
Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs MDY 0.0 pts vs SCHR
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.03%
Holdings 409 103
Net assets, IJH as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $122.8bn $39.7bn

IJH and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJH

IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.8% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 409 positions, with the top ten at 7.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGIT

VGIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VGIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.2% and VGIT −1.5%.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VGIT?
VGIT is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJH against VGIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-vgit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.