Which returned more over the last year, IGM or NOBL?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +21.7% and NOBL +15.5%.

Which is cheaper, IGM or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IGM and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

IGM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGM returned +21.7% to NOBL's +15.5%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IGM and NOBL

Net assets: $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

IGM on its own →NOBL on its own →

At a glance

+21.7%

IGM total return, 1 year

+15.5%

NOBL total return, 1 year

0.37%

IGM expense ratio

0.35%

NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NOBL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.2 points; NOBL is 1.1 times larger.

IGM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	IGM	NOBL
Return
Measure	IGM	NOBL
Total return, 1 year	+21.7%	+15.5%
Drawdown
Measure	IGM	NOBL
Below its high	6.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	IGM	NOBL
What it tracks	S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Measure	IGM	NOBL
Expense ratio	0.37%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$11.0bn	$11.7bn
Holdings
Measure	IGM	NOBL
Holdings in common	1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	56.8%	17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and NOBL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IGM NOBL

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 1.07% 1.70%

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES 0.20% 1.81%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IGM

APPLE 9.36%

MICROSOFT 9.19%

NVIDIA 8.28%

BROADCOM INC 7.07%

ALPHABET CLASS A 4.57%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.27%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.16%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.07%

Only in NOBL

BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%

FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%

CHEVRON CORP 1.66%

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.63%

MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares ProShares

What it is Tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats

Total return, 1 year +21.7% +15.5%

Expense ratio 0.37% 0.35%

Already in the S&P 500 91.9% 98.3%

Holdings 295 69

Net assets, IGM as of Oct 27, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $11.0bn $11.6bn

IGM and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

IGM

IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or NOBL?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +21.7% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, IGM or NOBL?: NOBL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

IGM vs RSP IGM vs SDY IGM vs VOE COWZ vs IGM IYW vs NOBL NOBL vs XLK NOBL vs VGT FTEC vs NOBL

Where to next

IGM on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IGM dividend history →IGM holdings →NOBL dividend history →NOBL holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IGM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IGM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IGM ↗

NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ProShares page for NOBL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IGM against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.