Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs NOBL: how they differ

FTEC and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in NOBL
NVIDIA Corp 18.00%INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.72%
Apple Inc 14.38%BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69%
Microsoft Corp 9.54%ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69%
Broadcom Inc 5.01%ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.68%
Micron Technology Inc 2.64%TARGET CORP 1.64%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%CHEVRON CORP 1.61%
Intel Corp 1.99%GENUINE PARTS CO 1.61%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

FTEC and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityProShares
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts−8.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%100.0%
Holdings28269

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or NOBL?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or NOBL?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources