Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IEMG vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEMG returned +15.3% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IEMG and XLF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $150.4bn for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLF costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; IEMG is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | IEMG | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.3% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI) | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $150.4bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.7% | 57.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IEMG and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEMG
IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +15.3% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or XLF?
- XLF is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IEMG against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IEMG against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-xlf
[IEMG against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iemg-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.