Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and PULS

Net assets: $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; IEFA is 9.6 times larger.

IEFA vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+4.0%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$190.1bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
IEFA PULS
Return
Total return edge IEFA +86.0% +32.2%
Annualized edge IEFA +7.5% +3.3%
Price return edge IEFA +42.7% −0.9%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 17.8% 1.9%
Max drawdown edge PULS −33.8% −5.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IEFA 0.34 0.27
Sortino edge IEFA 0.48 0.32
Calmar edge PULS 0.22 0.57
Reading

IEFA returned more: +86.0% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 17.8%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −33.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IEFA vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAPULSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+86.0%+32.2%IEFAPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.5%+3.3%IEFATotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+42.7%−0.9%IEFAPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.8%1.9%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.7%1.6%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−33.8%−5.9%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.340.27IEFAReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.480.32IEFAReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.220.57PULSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEFA PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PGIM
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.15%
Holdings 2629 553
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 $190.4bn $19.8bn

IEFA and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 151 days apart.

Alert

IEFA and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or PULS?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.