Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to SCHF's +17.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and SCHF
Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $69.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHF costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points.
| Measure | PULS | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +17.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 | $19.8bn | $69.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 13.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SCHF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
SCHF
SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and SCHF +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHF?
- SCHF is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against SCHF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against SCHF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schf
[PULS against SCHF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.