Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IEFA vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IEFA and MUB
Net assets: $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, and $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
MUB costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.7 points; IEFA is 3.5 times larger.
| Measure | IEFA | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.3% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI EAFE IMI Index | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.05% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $190.1bn | $54.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 12.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IEFA and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MUB
MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or MUB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and MUB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IEFA or MUB?
- MUB is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IEFA against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-mub
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IEFA against MUB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-mub
[IEFA against MUB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-mub)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.