Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs IMAR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to IMAR's +3.9%, and IEFA charges 0.07% to IMAR's 0.85%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and IMAR

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and $104m for Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF - Mar.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+3.9%
IMAR total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.85%
IMAR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.78 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.4bn against $104m.

IEFA vs IMAR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAIMAR
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+3.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Index fall to the buffer0.0%
Fund price fall to the buffer0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexEFA
The outcome period
Room to the cap13.0%
Buffer left, in index points13.3% of 15.0%
Days left in the period123
Period endsFeb 28, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.85%
Net assets$190.4bn$104m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Holdings datedOct 27, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%

Method

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF IMAR Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF - Mar
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Defined outcome, 15% on EFA
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +3.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +8.4% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX −4.5 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.85%
Holdings 2629 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets $190.4bn $104m

IEFA and IMAR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IEFA and IMAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IMAR

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 13.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EFA can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 13.3% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EFA level. 123 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are IEFA and IMAR in the same category?
IEFA is a stock ETF and IMAR is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or IMAR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and IMAR +3.9%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or IMAR?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.78 percentage points a year. That is about $78 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against IMAR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-imar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.