Which returned more over the last year, IEF or IWB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEF returned −2.7% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IEF or IWB?

IEF charges 0.15% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IEF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEF vs IWB: how they differ

IEF and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEF and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEF	Only in IWB
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 9.35%	NVIDIA 7.26%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 8.64%	APPLE 6.73%
TREASURY NOTE (OTR) 3.84%	MICROSOFT 5.21%
TREASURY BOND 0.77%	AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.52%	ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%
	BROADCOM INC 2.40%
	ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%
	META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IEF and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	7-10 Year Treasury Bond	Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+16.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−0.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	15	945

IEF in plain words

IEF is a bond fund tracking the 7-10 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 13.3% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEF or IWB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEF returned −2.7% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEF or IWB?: IEF charges 0.15% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IEF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEF against IWB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEF against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ief-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources