Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IDEV vs IJS: how they differ
IDEV and IJS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and IJS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IDEV | IJS |
|---|---|---|
| LVMH | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY | 0.21% | 0.55% |
| SIEMENS ENERGY N AG | 0.43% | 0.14% |
| UCB SA | 0.10% | 0.45% |
| CREDIT AGRICOLE SA | 0.07% | 0.28% |
| MTU AERO ENGINES HOLDING AG | 0.07% | 0.24% |
| USD CASH | 0.13% | 0.05% |
| FINECOBANK BANCA FINECO | 0.05% | 0.14% |
| TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE | 0.05% | 0.25% |
| CONTINENTAL AG | 0.03% | 0.23% |
| SIGMA HEALTHCARE | 0.03% | 0.43% |
| APERAM SA | 0.01% | 0.14% |
| Only in IDEV | Only in IJS |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING 2.29% | MATCH GROUP INC 1.08% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.22% | PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.99% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.02% | SM ENERGY 0.96% |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.98% | CARMAX INC 0.95% |
| SHELL PLC 0.91% | EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.86% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.88% | JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.81% |
| NOVARTIS AG 0.87% | LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.79% |
| NESTLE SA 0.85% | CONAGRA BRANDS 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI International Developed Markets | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +22.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +4.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1782 | 466 |
IDEV in plain words
IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1782 positions, with the top ten at 10.6%.
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 466 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or IJS?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and IJS returned +22.1%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IDEV or IJS?
- IDEV charges 0.04% a year and IJS charges 0.18%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IDEV and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against IJS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/idev-vs-ijs Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources