Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs IXUS: how they differ
IJS and IXUS hold 1% of their weight in the same names.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and IXUS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| MOELIS CLASS A | 0.22% | 0.28% |
| CORE NATURAL RESOURCES | 0.55% | 0.14% |
| ENERGIZER HOLDINGS INC | 0.14% | 0.30% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 1.68% | 0.09% |
| UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS INC | 0.45% | 0.07% |
| ARCOSA | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES | 0.24% | 0.05% |
| FB FINANCIAL | 0.14% | 0.04% |
| ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC | 0.43% | 0.03% |
| TRINITY INDUSTRIES INC | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| CONCENTRA GROUP HOLDINGS PARENT IN | 0.23% | 0.02% |
| SIGNET JEWELERS | 0.43% | 0.02% |
| Only in IJS | Only in IXUS |
|---|---|
| MATCH GROUP INC 1.08% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49% |
| PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.99% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21% |
| CARMAX INC 0.95% | SK HYNIX 1.79% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.86% | ASML HOLDING 1.55% |
| JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.81% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84% |
| LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.79% | TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78% |
| CONAGRA BRANDS 0.78% | ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70% |
| MATSON INC 0.76% | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Core MSCI Total International Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +22.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | +4.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 466 | 2540 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 466 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or IXUS?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or IXUS?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijs-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources