IDEQ vs IQLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

IDEQ and IQLT hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and IDEQ returned +23.0% over the year. Net assets: $1.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF, and $13.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF.

IQLT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points.

IDEQIQLT
Expense ratio0.40%0.30%
Net assets, IDEQ as of Jun 30, 2026 and IQLT as of Oct 9, 2026$1.5bn$13.6bn
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+14.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common16%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.8%23.7%
Below its high4.2%, high on Sep 4, 20264.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.0%
IDEQ total return, 1 year
+14.8%
IQLT total return, 1 year
0.40%
IDEQ expense ratio
0.30%
IQLT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDEQ and IQLT hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

16% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IDEQ IQLT
ASML Holding NV 3.44% 6.01%
AstraZeneca PLC 1.19% 1.59%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC 0.99% 1.41%
ABB Ltd 0.93% 1.93%
Advantest Corp 0.71% 2.24%
Fast Retailing Co Ltd 0.71% 0.72%
Novartis AG 0.68% 1.67%
Suncor Energy Inc 1.01% 0.66%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 0.54% 1.40%
TotalEnergies SE 0.45% 1.34%
BHP Group Ltd 0.45% 1.54%
Prudential PLC 0.77% 0.44%
Only in IDEQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.08%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.56%
SK hynix Inc 2.72%
Vinci SA 2.07%
BNP Paribas SA 2.01%
GSK PLC 1.80%
Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd 1.69%
Banco Santander SA 1.68%
Only in IQLT
ALLIANZ 2.57%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 2.20%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 1.86%
ZURICH INSURANCE GROUP AG 1.70%
NESTLE SA 1.69%
TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS 1.48%
IBERDROLA 1.35%
UNILEVER PLC 1.33%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IDEQ
Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +23.0% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +5.7 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 249 294
Net assets, IDEQ as of Jun 30, 2026 and IQLT as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.5bn $13.6bn

IDEQ and IQLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IDEQ in plain words

IDEQ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 249 positions, with the top ten at 25.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IQLT in plain words

IQLT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 294 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IDEQ or IQLT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEQ returned +23.0% and IQLT +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, IDEQ or IQLT?
IQLT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IDEQ and IQLT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEQ and 0% of IQLT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IDEQ against IQLT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ideq-vs-iqlt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.