Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBTJ vs SCHO: Differences, Returns & Fees
IBTJ's duration was 2.6 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SCHO's 1.8 on Jun 30, 2026; SCHO charges 0.03% to IBTJ's 0.07%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBTJ and SCHONet assets: $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF, and $13.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHO costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points.
| Measure | IBTJ | SCHO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +1.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.2%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index | Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, IBTJ as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHO as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.5bn | $13.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 6, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 346 weekly returnsSCHO returned more: +11.2% to −3.5%. SCHO swung less: 1.7% to 5.2%. SCHO fell less at its worst: −5.6% to −19.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IBTJ | SCHO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −3.5% | +11.2% | SCHO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −0.5% | +1.6% | SCHO | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −18.8% | −6.8% | SCHO | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 5.2% | 1.7% | SCHO | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 3.9% | 1.2% | SCHO | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −19.6% | −5.6% | SCHO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.65 | −0.82 | IBTJ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.87 | −1.13 | IBTJ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | −0.03 | 0.29 | SCHO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 346 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBTJ and SCHO hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBTJ and SCHO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBTJ and SCHO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IBTJ follows ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index and SCHO follows Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Index.
- Holdings in common. 19% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IBTJ returned +0.5% and SCHO +1.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IBTJ
IBTJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. It sat 6.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHO
SCHO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +1.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IBTJ or SCHO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBTJ returned +0.5% and SCHO +1.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IBTJ or SCHO?
- SCHO is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBTJ against SCHO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtj-vs-scho
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBTJ against SCHO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtj-vs-scho
[IBTJ against SCHO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtj-vs-scho)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.