Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBB vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to LQD's −3.4%, and LQD charges 0.14% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBB and LQDNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $30.6bn for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
LQD costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 40.9 points; LQD is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | IBB | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +37.5% | −3.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Biotech | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.14% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $30.6bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 40% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBB and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
LQD
LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are IBB and LQD in the same category?
- IBB is a thematic ETF and LQD is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IBB or LQD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and LQD −3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IBB or LQD?
- LQD is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBB against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-lqd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBB against LQD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-lqd
[IBB against LQD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-lqd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.