Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBB vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to IWO's +7.9%, and IWO charges 0.24% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBB and IWONet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWO costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 29.6 points; IWO is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | IBB | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +37.5% | +7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Biotech | Russell 2000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $14.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | 6.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 23, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,339 weekly returnsIBB returned slightly more: +586.4% to +566.5%. IWO swung slightly less: 23.5% to 24.3%. IWO fell slightly less at its worst: −56.5% to −59.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IBB | IWO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +586.4% | +566.5% | IBB (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.8% | +7.6% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +557.1% | +463.0% | IBB | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.3% | 23.5% | IWO (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 17.2% | 16.6% | IWO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −59.2% | −56.5% | IWO (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.36 | 0.36 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.50 | 0.50 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.13 | 0.14 | IWO (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,339 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and IWO hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
15% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBB and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB and IWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IBB follows Biotech and IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IBB returned +37.5% and IWO +7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 29.6 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
IWO
IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are IBB and IWO in the same category?
- IBB is a thematic ETF and IWO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IBB or IWO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and IWO +7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IBB or IWO?
- IWO is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBB against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBB against IWO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwo
[IBB against IWO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.