HYLB vs SJNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
HYLB's duration was 2.9 years on May 29, 2026 and SJNK's 2.3 on Jun 30, 2026; HYLB charges 0.05% to SJNK's 0.40%. Net assets: $3.2bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF, and $4.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF.
HYLB costs 0.35 points a year less; both returned +1.2% over a year; SJNK is 1.4 times larger.
| HYLB | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.40% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.2bn | $4.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| What it tracks | Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index | Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index |
| Holdings in common | 47% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
HYLB and SJNK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. HYLB follows Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index and SJNK follows Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index.
- Holdings in common. 47% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- Cost. HYLB charges 0.05% of assets a year and SJNK 0.40%, a gap of 0.35 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HYLB and SJNK hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
47% in common
On the same fields
HYLB and SJNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About HYLB
HYLB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.
About SJNK
SJNK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYLB or SJNK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYLB returned +1.2% and SJNK +1.2%.
- Which is cheaper, HYLB or SJNK?
- HYLB is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYLB against SJNK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hylb-vs-sjnk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). HYLB against SJNK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hylb-vs-sjnk
[HYLB against SJNK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hylb-vs-sjnk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.