Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYG vs VT: how they differ
HYG and VT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HYG and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HYG | Only in VT |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.68% | NVIDIA Corp 4.22% |
| 1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56% | Apple Inc 3.53% |
| MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.47% | Microsoft Corp 2.73% |
| PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.35% | Amazon.com Inc 2.29% |
| WULF COMPUTE LLC 144A 0.29% | Alphabet Inc 2.04% |
| GALAXY HELIOS DATA CENTERS II LLC 144A 0.28% | Broadcom Inc 1.74% |
| PANTHER ESCROW ISSUER LLC 144A 0.28% | Alphabet Inc 1.61% |
| SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.28% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | US high yield bonds | Total World Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +18.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | +1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 1326 | 10042 |
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
VT in plain words
VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or VT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or VT?
- HYG charges 0.49% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against VT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-vt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources