Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYG vs SLV: how they differ
HYG is a bond index fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +2.9%.
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and iShares Silver Trust.
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | SLV iShares Silver Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | US high yield bonds | Silver |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +53.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | +36.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 1326 | not filed |
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
SLV in plain words
SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or SLV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or SLV?
- HYG charges 0.49% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so HYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against SLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-slv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources