Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GLD vs HYG: how they differ
GLD is a commodity fund and HYG a bond index fund, and over the year GLD returned more, +19.1% against +2.9%.
SPDR Gold Shares and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | Gold | US high yield bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.49% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1326 |
GLD in plain words
GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GLD or HYG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +19.1% and HYG returned +2.9%, so GLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GLD or HYG?
- GLD charges 0.40% a year and HYG charges 0.49%, so GLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLD against HYG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-hyg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources