Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HYG vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYG returned +1.3% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYG and MTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $17.5bn for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
HYG total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.49%
HYG expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points; MTUM is 1.1 times larger.

HYG vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYGMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$17.5bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HYG and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYG MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HYG
1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.44%
ECHOSTAR CORP 0.40%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 144A 0.35%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.34%
CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP LLC 144A 0.32%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 144A 0.32%
CENTENE CORPORATION 0.31%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US high yield bonds Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +1.3% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +2.5 pts vs IUSB +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.15%
Holdings 1332 126
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $17.5bn $18.7bn

HYG and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HYG and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HYG

HYG tracks an index of US high yield bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYG or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +1.3% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, HYG or MTUM?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYG against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.